FontLab Forum
2012-02-09, 03:55:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to the FontLab forum, read how to use it! Update: Archives from old MSN forums are now available on our forum.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Downloads Tags Login Register  
Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Unicode 4.1 - SBL Hebrew upgrade available.  (Read 1604 times)
ArchivePoster
Guest
« on: 2005-04-20, 16:26:00 »

Posted by: ChrisKimball
         
Some holes in the Unicode standard have been repaired in Version 4.1.  Will the SBL Hebrew font be upgraded to show the new characters?

         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #1 on: 2005-04-24, 18:39:00 »

Posted by: John Hudson
         
Glyphs and layout support for the new Unicode 4.1 characters have been added to the next version of SBL Hebrew, which is currently being tested. It will be released in May.

There are a number of significant changes in the new version of the font, requiring a substantial rewrite of the manual. Some users may need to re-encode some documents (e.g. by using search-replace routines or macros).

As those of you who have followed discussions over the past two years regarding Unicode handling of Biblical Hebrew will know, there have been a number of uncertainties about how to encode particular things, which are only gradually being cleared up. In the current release version of SBL Hebrew, I made some guesses about the best way to handle things, and sometimes those guesses were wrong or, at least, contrary to what has become the consensus for correct encoding. The biggest issue is how to encode the distinction between holam male and vav haluma, and this is something that, frustratingly, is now largely agreed but only partially implemented in Unicode.

In the current release version of SBL Hebrew, the character sequence results in vav haluma, following the convention of holam applied to other letters. The consensus is now that this sequence would be better rendered as holam male (visually distinguished with the holam further to the right), which is much more common than vav haluma, so I have changed this in the new version of the font. The mechanism for encoding holam male as has been removed from the font, since it is contrary to Unicode character ordering rules. There is, at present, no means to encode a distinct vav haluma: this is something that is being addressed by Unicode, but which didn't make it into version 4.1 of the standard. So there will need to be another update of the font for Unicode 5.0, at some later date.

Most other changes in the font should only have a document encoding impact for a small number of users, since they concern encoding of the rare puncta extraordinaria.
         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #2 on: 2005-06-03, 17:12:00 »

Posted by: Sol_23151
         
John,

Did you say below that the font would be available in May of next year, or
did you mean the end of last month? If the latter, are the font and the
documentation available at the SBL's site yet? If not, when will they be
available?

Cheers,



Gilbert Lozano
Messiah College
Biblical and Religious Studies Dept.
Box 3053
One College Avenue
Grantham, PA 17027
(717) 796-1800 ext. 6724

>>> tiro@tiro.com 06/02/05 02:14AM >>>
-----------------------------------------------------------

New Message on SBL Fonts

-----------------------------------------------------------
From: John Hudson
Message 2 in Discussion

Glyphs and layout support for the new Unicode 4.1 characters have been
added to the next version of SBL Hebrew, which is currently being tested. It
will be released in May.

There are a number of significant changes in the new version of the font,
requiring a substantial rewrite of the manual. Some users may need to
re-encode some documents (e.g. by using search-replace routines or macros).

As those of you who have followed discussions over the past two years
regarding Unicode handling of Biblical Hebrew will know, there have been a
number of uncertainties about how to encode particular things, which are
only gradually being cleared up. In the current release version of SBL
Hebrew, I made some guesses about the best way to handle things, and
sometimes those guesses were wrong or, at least, contrary to what has become
the consensus for correct encoding. The biggest issue is how to encode the
distinction between holam male and vav haluma, and this is something that,
frustratingly, is now largely agreed but only partially implemented in
Unicode.

In the current release version of SBL Hebrew, the character sequence holam> results in vav haluma, following the convention of holam applied to
other letters. The consensus is now that this sequence would be better
rendered as holam male (visually distinguished with the holam further to the
right), which is much more common than vav haluma, so I have changed this in
the new version of the font. The mechanism for encoding holam male as
has been removed from the font, since it is contrary to Unicode
character ordering rules. There is, at present, no means to encode a
distinct vav haluma: this is something that is being addressed by Unicode,
but which didn't make it into version 4.1 of the standard. So there will
need to be another update of the font for Unicode 5.0, at some later date.

Most other changes in the font should only have a document encoding impact
for a small number of users, since they concern encoding of the rare puncta
extraordinaria.

-----------------------------------------------------------

To stop getting this e-mail, or change how often it arrives, go to your
E-mail Settings.
http://groups.msn.com/SBLFonts/_emailsettings.msnw

Need help? If you've forgotten your password, please go to Passport Member
Services.
http://groups.msn.com/_passportredir.msnw?ppmprop=help

For other questions or feedback, go to our Contact Us page.
http://groups.msn.com/contact

If you do not want to receive future e-mail from this MSN group, or if you
received this message by mistake, please click the "Remove" link below. On
the pre-addressed e-mail message that opens, simply click "Send". Your
e-mail address will be deleted from this group's mailing list.
mailto:SBLFonts-remove@groups.msn.com

         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #3 on: 2005-06-06, 21:13:00 »

Posted by: John Hudson
         
The font is ready, but the documentation is not. I'm trying to update the documentation to include appropriate discussion of advances in Biblical Hebrew support on Mac and Linux, but will try not to let this hold up the release very long.

I also need to prepare a new keyboard driver and documentation, but that could ship after the font. The keyboard driver is problematic because the uninstall/install process for upgrades is not very simple.
         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #4 on: 2005-06-12, 20:25:00 »

Posted by: ChrisKimball
         
Your comments in the sidebar on page 16 of the DRAFT 1.09 manual on the holem-vav matter are well-taken.
 
Two other improvements in Unicode 4.1 (and implemented in the font) are the Hebrew lower dot (U+05C5) and the nun hafucha (U+05C6) for which work-arounds are available.  Are there other improvements to consider?
 
Two other questions:
 
1. Will the former font continue to be available at the SBL Hebrew page?
 
2. Are the terms for distribution of the font the same as earlier?
 
For the moment, I'll probably wait until Unicode 5.0 is implemented before reworking
 
 
Comments on this matter would be appreciated.
 
 
 

         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #5 on: 2005-06-12, 20:40:00 »

Posted by: John Hudson
         
Unicode 4.1 also includes two additional Hebrew marks that are not mentioned in the draft manual. I will prepare an additional page on these. These new characters are a distinct qamats qatan (U+05C7) and atnah hafukh (U+05A2). These both present some disunification issues, which I have not figured out yet.

No, the older version of the font will not continue to be available after the formal release of the new version. The new version is intended to replace the earlier one. The earlier font included some hacks that we don't want to encourage now that we have standard support from Unicode.

Yes, the terms of distribution remain the same.
         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #6 on: 2005-06-12, 20:44:00 »

Posted by: John Hudson
         
PS. Your electronic Tanakh is very cool! I like very much being able to turn the accents and vowels off selectively.
         
Logged
ArchivePoster
Guest
« Reply #7 on: 2005-06-21, 19:43:00 »

Posted by: ChrisKimball
         
Within a month or two, I'll have the examples from the Unicode 4.1 documentation available as a web page at:
 
 
I encourage folks to use the SBL Hebrew font, which is the default font for these pages.

         
Logged
Tags:
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!