|
ArchivePoster
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: 2007-08-03, 19:09:00 » |
|
Posted by: John Hudson Type sizing is usually a layout level operation, not a font operation. It could be done in a font, using OpenType glyph variants, but I don't think there is much benefit in doing so. In fact, since font size information is a basic element of rich text layout, while OpenType glyph variants are at a higher, less reliably interchanged level, I would recommend implementing larger and smaller letters by changing the font size, as has apparently been done in the typographic examples on the (very useful) 'special letters' page. Obviously for correct display of the smaller letters one would want to offset them from the baseline, but this is also a function that word processing and page layout applications typically provide.
The only situation I can think of in which it might be useful for the larger or smaller letters to be variants in the font would be if they were used in a situation in which the holam mark 'drifts', i.e. if they were followed by a weak aleph or, indeed, where themselves weak alephs preceded by a holam. In that case, it would be important for the glyphs to be in a single size of a single font, because changes in type size delimit glyph runs for OpenType Layout. But I didn't notice such a situation in the list of Torah examples on the web page.
|