|
ArchivePoster
Guest
|
 |
« on: 2006-07-16, 03:49:00 » |
|
Posted by: John Hudson I am down to the last couple of dozen glyphs that need to be drawn and hinted to round out the character sets for the SBL Greek and SBL BibLit fonts (as well as for a new version of the SBL Hebrew). Some of these are common to all three fonts, and desirable to be able to claim specific codepage compatibility coverage for Windows and Mac operating systems (e.g. currency symbols).
In addition to these common glyphs. The SBL BibLit font will contain a subset of Germanic blackletter letters (mapped to symbol and maths Unicode characters) for use in textual apparatus. Eventually, it would be good to support a complete upper and lowercase set in this style, but that is akin to designing a whole new typeface, so I have identified a subset of letters based on review of a number of major critical editions in the field of Biblical Studies (BHS, Nestle-Aland, DBG Vulgate):
Afraktur u1D504 Adieresisfraktur u1D5040308 Bfraktur u1D505 Cfraktur uni212D Cfraktur_commaabovecomb uni212D0313 Gfraktur u1D50A Hfraktur uni210C Kfraktur u1D50E Lfraktur u1D50F Mfraktur u1D510 Pfraktur u1D513 Qfraktur u1D514 Rfraktur u1D515 Sfraktur u1D516 Tfraktur u1D517 Vfraktur u1D519 Wfraktur u1D51A bfraktur u1D587 cfraktur u1D588 dfraktur u1D589 hfraktur u1D58D pfraktur u1D52D ofraktur u1D594 rfraktur u1D597 sfraktur u1D598 vfraktur u1D59B wfraktur u1D59C
The question I'm considering now is the specific style of blackletter that should be used in the SBL BibLit font. The glyph names used in development, based on the Unicode character names, say 'fraktur', but this is presumably because this style is most commonly used in the context of mathematical typesetting, and the term is often (mistakenly) used as a synonym for blackletter. I have begun designing these glyphs as a schwabacher, since this is the style used in the textual apparatus of the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, with which I began. I think this style works well for most purposes, and will be welcome in familiarity to students of the BHS; however, other editions I have looked at use different styles, and there are some letterforms, notably the uppercase H, which do not occur in BHS but do in other texts, and which are hard for readers unfamiliar with the schwabacher style to identify.
I'm wondering if there is a particular style that is preferred by SBL font users, especially those involved in publishing?
One option I have been considering is a kind of simplified schwabacher in which letters such as H do not follow the typical form of the style, but are designed to be more easily identifiable to readers unfamiliar with some of the idiosyncrasies of Germanic chirography.
Any thoughts?
|